Mobile-first, not mobile-tolerated
Designed at phone width first, then expanded. Touch targets, thumb reach and short scroll runs come before desktop layout decisions.
Most students reach a support tool on a phone, between a class and a shift, already stressed. Accessibility, speed and privacy aren't compliance line items here — they decide whether anyone finishes.
Interface & navigation
A student arriving at a support tool is already carrying enough. The interface should subtract effort, not add it.
Designed at phone width first, then expanded. Touch targets, thumb reach and short scroll runs come before desktop layout decisions.
One idea per screen, generous spacing, restrained colour. Visual attractiveness here is a functional requirement — it is what keeps a stressed student engaged.
Every screen ends with what to do now: book, apply, read, or talk to someone. Reflection converts to action in one tap, not after a hunt.
Quizzes, visual profiles, indicator graphics, service maps, short tutorials and contextual content — formats that hold attention, chosen per situation.
Runs as its own web application, or inside Moodle and your student portal as an embedded app — the same experience either way.
A single interface gathers the resources of every service. It points to the existing pages your teams already maintain instead of duplicating and stranding them.
Digital accessibility
Accessibility is verified during development, not audited after launch. The design system carries it so every new screen inherits it.

Privacy & consent
The fastest way to make a self-assessment tool useless is to make students suspect it is watching them. So the default is: nothing is kept.
| Situation | What is stored | What the institution sees |
|---|---|---|
| No account, no consent | Nothing. Answers live in the session and are discarded when it ends. | Anonymous, aggregated usage counts only — never individual responses. |
| Consent given to save | The results the student explicitly chose to keep, under their own account. | Still aggregate. Individual results are the student's, visible to a service only if the student shares them. |
| Consent withdrawn | Saved results are deleted or anonymised, including in backups on the documented cycle. | Aggregate trends remain; the individual contribution is no longer attributable. |
| Student books a service | Only what the service needs to hold the appointment. | The receiving team sees the context the student agreed to pass along. |
Consultation without an account is a first-class mode, not a degraded one. Institutions decide which sections stay open anonymously and which require authentication — and the tool tells the student which mode they are in, before they answer anything.
Inclusion
In the Université du Québec network, one student in two is first-generation, 44 % study part-time, 77 % work during their studies and the average age across all three cycles is nearly 30. The "typical student" the generic path is written for is a minority. Specific navigation is architecture, not an add-on.
Accommodation paths, the accessibility office's own process, and an interface that meets the standard the accommodation assumes.
Status, work permits, health coverage, banking and housing — the questions that arrive before the academic ones, in a dedicated path.
Childcare, scheduling, financial aid for dependants, and the deferral rules that actually apply to them.
Dedicated navigation to the services, funding and community supports that exist for them, authored with the teams responsible.
Supervision relationships, funding, research administration, extensions — a path that doesn't pretend a doctoral student has an undergraduate problem.
No assumed vocabulary and no assumed knowledge of how a university works. Terms are explained where they are used.
We'd rather be tested with a screen reader in the room. Bring the people who will judge it — that's the useful demo.
Book a Demo